CONTINGENCY CONTROVERSY
By Sonny DiMeo
Independent Broker Network
December 2006

    
For a number of you, contingency earnings are a vital part of your agency's profitability. I guess the best way to look at contingency profits is to consider it the broker fee for agents. Since agents can not charge fees, their supplemental earnings come by the way of performance guarantees. And now, those earnings are being challenged. Recently, Eliot Spitzer informed AIG, Zurich , ACE and St. Paul/Travelers that more than 65% of the market do NOT pay contingencies and that per their signed agreement with the States Attorney, they too must discontinue this practice. I for one, am affected by that decision and my hope is that this does not set a precedent for other carriers to discontinue compensating agents for their profitable business. I suspect it will not. Why? Days after this announcement was made and rippled across the country, St. Paul/Travelers had a conference call to their agents to dispell any rumors that they would discontinue rewarding their best agents for their profitable performance. This comes as a great relief but it looks like the above mentioned carriers will have to re-invent the profitability wheel in order to remain in compliance. After listening to the conference call, I do feel that everything will be fine and it may even lead to even better profit sharing formulas. I just cant see some of the largest insurers in the world throwing in the towel and allowing their best agents suffer due to the wrong doings of a handful of large brokerages. We will find out during the first quarter of 2007 exactly how this plan will be reworked to satisfy both the agents and the insurer's legal departments.

For those of you who are not agents for any of your carriers, life is pretty good right now. Of course, the phone is not ringing as much as it should but I am hoping that the media will continue to pick up on the registration suspension notices that are being sent on in the tens of thousands. This SB 1500 Bill might just become the tipping point for many consumers to reconsider driving without insurance. The more important issue is whether or not the court system will impose the fines and uphold the enforcement requirements or will they slap the offenders on the wrist and utilize minimum fines. California is very late to the party when it comes to mandatory financial responsibility enforcement. Many other states have had a system in place with the DMV for year; however, they dont have to deal with a population such as California nor the administrative nightmare that this can lead to. In any case, I am hopeful that this bill will prove to be what it was intended to be. As far as broker fees, there has been pressure to minimize the amount charged to client due to market pressures. Better to get $50 and a new client then nothing at all. In this kind of a system, I like the idea of placing customers in the system at a low cost and then working with those customers to secure other insurance policies. I know it sounds "old-school" but we have returned to the days of "one stop" shopping in order to satisfy the convenience needs of our customers. Matt Pickett is an insurance broker in San Jose and a member of IBN and has often shared his techniques in rounding out his customer base "old-school" style. He has no advertising budget and uses only 2-4 companies. Matt sends a newsletter to his customers and educates them about the need to have additional coverages and policies to protect their needs. He uses a soft sell approach and always signs off by saying "WE LOVE REFERRALS". This is just a small sampling of what he does but it works. I have also spoken to some agency owners who find themselves in a situation where they have minimized their staff and in some cases are the only licensed producer. They hire a couple of part time employees to process certificates, endorsements, new business and any other task that an unlicensed employee can do for them and this allows the principal to concentrate on new business. I employ this strategy and I like it. If you can get with a company who offers in-house customer support, it is even better. The cost to join this service is usually 1.5 to 2.0 points of commission but it is much cheaper than hiring somebody and the customer service unit is never sick, knows the product line very well and never asks for Mondays and Fridays off! LOL. Cost cutting is key but cutting into the bone is not. Many companies such as Explorer, Viking, CenCal, SCJ, Anchor General, Infinity, AIG and many others will allow your customer to call them directly to process payments and you can go online to process endorsements. My suggestion would be to look closely at your favorite carriers and see which ones you feel comfortable with referring your customer service needs to. This will free up more time for you to send out cross-selling and rounding-out letters to your customers. If you are sitting at your desk and wondering whey the phone isnt ringing, its because brokers such as Matt Pickett are taking your clients because they are working smarter. I really feel that payment processing is a waste of agency time. I believe that you should educate your customer to use the insurance company/general agency website to process payments whenever possible and to de-emphasize walk-in business unless it leads to writing new business. The real money is made by adding app. count not earning a puny $5 fee by taking a payment. Just my opinion and you may disagree but my experience has been that it costs the agency money everytime somebody walks in the door and unless you are earning above and beyond that cost, you are losing money. Keep those aisles clear and open dialogue with your customers. If you are not contacting your customer at least 4-6 times/year(other than sending a bill), you are out of their minds for the most part and this has all been proven by the research teams of some of the world's largest insurance companies such as The Hartford and Safeco. And by the way, DONT send your cross-selling letters along with the customers bill. Take the time to send a separate mailing on your letterhead with a positive tone. Insurance premium billings are not and never will be mail that your customer wants to spend much time with. I have tried it and learned from it and thought I would share it. In any case, please try some of these suggestions in 2007 and see if it changes your agency's production numbers and general operating procedures.....you might just be surprised.

 IBN HOME PAGE